Where is intel atom processor used

However, a few of them are dual-core CPUs, which consist of two processors on a chip instead of one. As a result, the dual core CPUs are twice as powerful as the single core ones. As of May , the Celeron has a peak clock speed of 3. Although generally slower than the Celeron, the Atom is designed as a more energy-efficient chip, consuming as little as.

By contrast, the lowest power consumption figure for the Celeron is 5 watts from the ULV Each Celeron and Atom chip has two cache levels for faster retrieval of data. The Celeron can have an L2 cache of up to 2MB. Your name and email address will not be added to any mailing list, and you will not receive email from Intel Corporation unless requested. All information provided is subject to change at any time, without notice. Intel may make changes to manufacturing life cycle, specifications, and product descriptions at any time, without notice.

The information herein is provided "as-is" and Intel does not make any representations or warranties whatsoever regarding accuracy of the information, nor on the product features, availability, functionality, or compatibility of the products listed.

Please contact system vendor for more information on specific products or systems. System and Maximum TDP is based on worst case scenarios.

Skip To Main Content. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox. Products Home Product Specifications Processors. Search examples You can search our catalog of processors, chipsets, kits, SSDs, server products and more in several ways. Pragmatically, the Atom N is the same as the model, save for no bit support and a lower power-draw. There is only one dual-core Atom chip currently available, the , and the die-size is exactly double that of chips. What this means is that new supporting core-logics are required, and Intel has cashed-in by bundling its archaic mobile 9-series chipsets with Atom.

The initial batch of Atom chips were connected to the iG chipset, which consumed as much as 22W on its own. More recently, netbook manufacturers have used the improved iGSE chipset that pulls considerably less power, at 8W. The trouble with both chipsets lies with the integrated graphics — GMA — that can only be considered as poor for gaming purposes. Even then, the graphics component of GN40 is specified on very few machines. An understanding of the architecture behind Atom highlights that the chip and supporting core-logic combination, which provide low-power, inexpensive computing, are a good fit for small, cheap computers.

Netbooks are thin, light laptops, usually weighing around 1kg, that ship with the Atom N chip and, now, Intel iGSE graphics. The same core technology has been taken by manufacturers and positioned in nettops, which can be thought of as netbooks but without a screen.

Eschewing power for portability and low prices, Atom-powered computers are a decent fit for Internet-centric devices that serve as second or even third PCs. The proviso is that the overall performance, from both CPU and graphics, may be found wanting if the user engages in vigorous multi-tasking. Planning to give AMD a bloody nose, going by Intel-produced numbers. Epyc processors and Instinct accelerators will be the hardware stars of the show.