What do you use 55 200mm lens for

You can capture this amazing scene only if you have a wider FoV. City view from a high place is something uncommon with normal people, but party scene is. Everyone is scattered. The boys are grilling in that corner, the girls are playing in the pools, and the children are dancing.

What an exciting moment! Grab your m lens and everybody is partying in your photo. As it is an upgraded version of the wide lens, mm has more utilities. You can do nothing when you see a beautifully blooming flower, as the only appear in your photos is the entire garden. It will help you solve most of the problem. They tell the same for mm lenses. But it is a bit contrasting. But when you suddenly want to save this awesome moment of life, you may hate your mm lens.

Every wildlife photography carries a mm with them. When you want to have an overview of the field full of wild animals, you can use the lowest 55mm zoom. And when you notice a couple of running deer, just turn your lens to the maximum focal length. The effect of mm is not related to animal only. A portrait of someone in the sunshine, ie: your lover, is an artful work.

You should try it at least once as a photographer. The standard focal length for taking a portrait is 55mm, but you must pay attention the aperture too.

Sport, life or any scenes that the objects should be centrally focused is mm favorites. When your reach the highest zoom sizes, the object will become bigger. This offer chances to make the target more outstanding. With that distance of zoom, you can shoot many things from afar.

The EF-M mm features a specified minimum focus distance of The uncropped image below shows the maximum magnification possible with the EF-M mm lens. The empirically determined MFD is a bit closer than the specified distance, so the corresponding maximum magnification is slightly higher than the rated 0.

Higher magnifications could be obtained by using extension tubes, although the additional magnification gained by using extension tubes is reduced at telephoto focal lengths. Canon does not make extension tubes for the EF-M mount, but there are third party extension tubes available. Overall, the EF-M series has a minimalist design coupled with good build quality. Like the other recent EF-M lenses, the exterior body of the EF-M mm is polycarbonate, including the diamond-textured zoom and focus rings, with the lens mount also being plastic.

This relatively compact lens feels somewhat heavier than expected. Combined with the tight manufacturing tolerances, these attributes give this lens a more solid feel in the hand than one would expect for a lens primarily constructed of plastic.

The 2" 51mm zoom ring comprises most of the length of the lens barrel with approximately 1. The 0. Consistent with the minimalist design, there are no controls on the lens itself other than the zoom and focus rings. The EF-M mount adapter provides the additional distance needed between the lens and the sensor when using any of the other lenses listed in the table above. As such, the more relevant comparison requires adding an extra 3. The same lenses are shown below as they would be mounted on an EOS M camera, fully extended with hoods in place and with the mount adapter on EF-mount lenses.

Use the site's product image comparison tool to visually compare the EF-M mm to a variety of other lenses. The EF-M mm takes 52mm diameter filters, a relatively small size that is shared with several other small lenses. The addition of a standard filter or a slim CPL has no significant impact on vignetting, while a standard CPL will cause a very slight increase in vignetting at maximum aperture.

Lens hoods reduce the effect of flare, which increases image contrast, and they also provide physical protection for the front of the lens.

The ETB is deep enough to provide some physical protection and the round design as opposed to petal-shaped makes it easy to set the lens front-down with the hood in place.

Canon recommends the optional Canon LP Lens Pouch for this lens, a pouch which is large enough to hold the lens with the inner barrel extended. Good alternatives include the Lowepro Dashpoint 20 perfect fit for the lens with hood reversed or Lowepro Lens Case 8x Although not the least expensive telephoto zoom lens, the EF-M mm is close to that mark. The relatively low cost combined with the very good image quality, small size and light weight make this lens an excellent value for EOS M owners looking to extend their reach.

A telephoto lens is a commonly purchased second or third lens for many photographers, and in many cases, a telephoto zoom lens is bundled with a general purpose zoom lens and a camera body in a two-lens kit. There are several choices in this focal range from Canon as well as third-party manufacturers, although when the focal length goes above mm, those choices are generally lenses compatible with full frame cameras. However, if you are looking for a telephoto zoom lens with a native EF-M mount, the choice is quite simple — the EF-M mm is currently the only lens that meets that criteria.

As pointed out above, all of them are larger and heavier than the EF-M mm. The EF-S lens is one-third of a stop faster throughout the focal length range.

Both lenses have similar vignetting and similar susceptibility to flare and the EF-M mm has slightly less barrel distortion at the wide end. The build quality of the two lenses is similar. The lower cost is really the only significant advantage these two lenses offer — the EF-M mm delivers substantially better image quality across the focal length range.

Even though both lenses offer a longer telephoto focal length, better results on any EOS M series camera will generally be obtained by using the EF-M mm and cropping the resulting images. The EF-M mm is sharper at the wide end of the focal range and the two lenses deliver similar sharpness at the long end. The EF mm IS II has substantially less vignetting and distortion which is expected when using a full frame lens on an APS-C camera, as those optical effects are primarily seen at the periphery of the image circle which is unused by APS-C cameras.

That solid build comes at the tradeoff of triple the weight of the EF-M mm. Still, the differences are likely not substantial enough to impact everyday shooting. The useful focal length range, better-than-expected IS performance and good AF performance add further value and utility. Bringing you this site is my full-time job typically hours per week.

Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. I am grateful for your support! Far from deliver stunning award-winning pictures, this lens is however capable of taking decent shots, much better than one might expect from price and build quality.

Bokeh is surprisingly good for instance. When it gets down to it, it is only a matter or what one's real needs are. You will not be able to freeze wild animals or birds with it for example, but you can take good candids of your wife and kids, blur the background nicely around them, and doing that without standing right in front of them and thus distracting them with your aimed camera.

If your other lens is the EF-S "kit lens" I'd give and actually gave this tele zoom a try, given its cost it is likely worth the investment. If, after some usage, you find that you like the possibilities that telephoto lenses open, chances are that you will replace it with a better and more expensive lens as I did. If you find that you still shoot mostly landscapes, you will not have wasted much money and gained a good "just in case" lens.

This was As other have said; this is a cheap lense and that shows. Build guality is My lense shows wearing after 10 years. I have since replaced this lence by L lenses and there is a very huge IQ difference. Especially contrast and color reproducing. This lense gives blueish images compared to L lenses. I still have it when hiking because there is not much extra weight in my backpack. And it does not matter if this lens gets smashed during the hike! This would have been a good beginner's lens if it was as cheap as the kit lens.

But no, I'd rather recommend a third-party lens than this one Yes it is usuable but I guess its better to invest in a better lens, the price vs. This lens is cheap - that's prettty much sums it up. Oh, and it's light too. If you need a cheap and light lens, then this is probably it - if that's all you need. You will compromise on image and build quality big time, though. Even ultrazooms mm lenses can deliver better IQ. New to this game and unaware of the lens's weaknesses, I took a number of shots fully open at mm mm equivalent.

They turned out to be reasonably satisfactory up to about A4 size but when I had a couple blown up to poster size, they turned out to be rather soft, despite some fiddling in Photoshop.

I'll be getting something better before my next overseas trip and maybe an EOS-5D. I just echo the first reviewer's assessment - good travel lens for casual work. I use mine for railroad photography in daylight and get plenty of nice results.